Hunter.io finds emails from a static database. Scrupp scrapes leads directly from LinkedIn and Sales Navigator, then enriches them with verified emails, phone numbers, and full company data — all in one export.
Choose Hunter.io if you only need to look up emails by domain from a pre-built database. Choose Scrupp if you need to scrape leads from LinkedIn and get emails, phones, and company data in one step.
Built for teams that need more than email-only lookups.
Quick answer
The best Hunter.io alternative in 2026 is one that works directly on LinkedIn profiles, not just on company domains. Hunter is great for "I have a domain, find the team" but most outbound starts on a Sales Navigator search — and Hunter doesn't natively process those. Scrupp runs as a free Chrome extension on LinkedIn and Sales Navigator, finds verified work emails plus phone numbers in the same export, uses a multi-provider waterfall (vs Hunter's single source), and is pay-as-you-go starting at $0/mo (vs Hunter's $49/mo). For SDRs who live in LinkedIn, it's the more natural fit.
Context
Hunter.io works well for one thing: finding emails by domain. But most prospecting workflows need more than that. When teams want to start from LinkedIn, get phone numbers, and pay only for leads they actually export, they look for something broader.
Hunter does not scrape LinkedIn or Sales Navigator. You need a separate tool to build lead lists.
Hunter focuses on email addresses. No phone numbers, no firmographic enrichment in the same workflow.
Hunter charges per seat. Teams that grow fast pay more even if they export the same volume.
Comparison
Hunter.io is an email finder that looks up contacts by domain using a static, crawled database. Scrupp is a LinkedIn scraper + enrichment tool that exports leads and enriches them with verified emails, phone numbers, and company data.
| Category | Hunter.io | Scrupp |
|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn / SN scraping | No — Hunter does not scrape LinkedIn or Sales Navigator | Yes — export leads from LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, and Apollo |
| Phone numbers | No — email addresses only | Yes — phone numbers included in exports |
| Real-time verification | No — static database, emails may be outdated | Yes — real-time verification with under 5% bounce rate |
| Company data | Limited — basic company info tied to domain search | Full firmographics — industry, size, location, revenue, and more |
| Pricing model | Per seat — costs scale with team size | Per exported lead — pay only for data you use |
| CSV enrichment | Yes — bulk email lookup from uploaded CSVs | Yes — enrich CSVs with emails, phones, and company data |
| API | Yes — email finder and verifier endpoints | Yes — full scraping, enrichment, and export API |
Pricing
Hunter.io charges per seat with monthly search quotas. Each additional team member adds cost regardless of how many leads they export. Scrupp charges per exported lead — your cost scales with output, not headcount.
| Item | Hunter.io | Scrupp |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing unit | Per seat + monthly search/verification quotas | Per exported lead — no seat fees |
| Email verification | Included in quota; static database results | Real-time verification included — no extra cost |
| Phone numbers | Not available | Included in every export at no extra cost |
Note: Exact plan prices can change; this section reflects publicly documented pricing models.
Features
Hunter.io is an email-focused tool. Scrupp combines scraping and enrichment. Use this matrix to see which features matter for your workflow.
| Feature / capability | Hunter.io | Scrupp |
|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn / Sales Navigator scraping | Not supported | Export leads from LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, and Apollo |
| Email finder | Domain Search and Email Finder from static crawled database | Verified emails found in real time during export; 65% avg find rate |
| Email verification | Email Verifier available; results based on static data | Real-time verification; under 5% bounce rate |
| Phone numbers | Not available | Phone numbers included in every export |
| Company / firmographic data | Limited company info from domain searches | Full firmographics: industry, size, location, revenue, tech stack |
| CSV / bulk enrichment | Bulk email lookup via CSV upload | Bulk enrichment with emails, phones, and company data |
| API access | REST API for email finder and verifier | Full API for scraping, enrichment, and export |
| Chrome extension | Extension for finding emails on websites | Extension for scraping LinkedIn/SN profiles and search results |
| Cold email campaigns | Built-in campaign sending feature | Focused on data; integrates with any outreach tool |
If your only need is "find an email for this domain," Hunter works. If your workflow starts on LinkedIn and requires emails, phones, and company data, Scrupp is the better fit.
Data
Hunter.io relies on a static, crawled database. Emails can go stale between crawl cycles. Scrupp verifies in real time during export — 65% average email find rate, under 5% bounce.
Check which fields you need in your CSV or CRM. Hunter covers email; Scrupp covers the full contact + company picture.
| Field group | Hunter.io | Scrupp |
|---|---|---|
| Identity | Name + email from domain search results | Full LinkedIn profile data (name, title, location, etc.) |
| Company | Basic: domain, company name | Full firmographics: industry, size, revenue, location, tech |
| Email (verified) | Yes — from static crawled database | Yes — real-time verified, under 5% bounce |
| Phone numbers | Not available | Included in every export |
| LinkedIn URL | Sometimes included in results | Always included — scraping starts from LinkedIn |
Hunter.io crawls the web and builds an email index. This means results depend on when the domain was last crawled. If someone changed jobs since the last crawl, the email may bounce.
If deliverability matters to you (and it should for cold outreach), prioritize tools that verify emails at the moment of export — not tools that serve cached results from weeks or months ago.
API
Hunter's API covers email finding and verification. Scrupp's API covers the full pipeline: scrape leads from LinkedIn, enrich with emails + phones + company data, and export.
These are the workflows that push teams beyond email-only tools like Hunter.
The main reason teams switch from Hunter to Scrupp is scope: they need LinkedIn scraping, phone numbers, and company data — not just email lookups. The switch also simplifies the stack from two tools to one.
Use cases
If email-only domain lookups are enough, Hunter works. If you need LinkedIn scraping, phones, company data, and per-lead pricing, Scrupp is the better alternative.
Multi-client prospecting from LinkedIn with enriched deliverables. No per-seat costs as the team grows.
Scrape Sales Navigator lists, get verified emails and phone numbers, load into CRM — one tool.
API-based enrichment pipelines. Replace the Hunter + scraper combo with one integrated tool.
Full API for scraping + enrichment. Build lead generation into your product or internal tools.
FAQ
Common questions when evaluating whether to switch from Hunter.io to Scrupp.
Yes, for most prospecting workflows. Scrupp covers everything Hunter does (email finding and verification) and adds LinkedIn/Sales Navigator scraping, phone numbers, and company data. The one feature Hunter has that Scrupp does not is built-in cold email campaign sending.
No. Hunter.io finds emails by searching its own crawled database using domain names. It does not scrape LinkedIn or Sales Navigator. To build lead lists from LinkedIn, you need a separate tool — or you can use Scrupp, which combines scraping and enrichment.
Scrupp verifies emails in real time during export, averaging a 65% find rate with under 5% bounce. Hunter serves results from a static database, which means emails can go stale between crawl updates. For cold outreach, real-time verification generally produces better deliverability.
Yes. Scrupp includes phone numbers in every export at no extra cost. Hunter.io does not provide phone numbers — it is focused on email addresses only.
Hunter charges per seat with monthly search quotas — adding team members increases the bill. Scrupp charges per exported lead. Your cost is based on how much data you actually use, not how many people are on your team.
The APIs are different in scope. Hunter's API is focused on email finding and verification. Scrupp's API covers LinkedIn scraping, enrichment (emails + phones + company data), and export. It is not a drop-in replacement, but it covers a broader set of use cases. Check the API docs for endpoint details.
Get LinkedIn scraping, verified emails, phone numbers, and company data in one tool. Pay per lead, not per seat.
Sources
These are the official pages referenced for documented features and pricing models. Links open the source pages; kept on-page for transparency.