Updated for 2025 decision search

Best Evaboot Alternative for Scalable LinkedIn Lead Export & Automation

Evaboot is well-known for exporting clean Sales Navigator data with a Chrome extension. Scrupp is built for teams that also need verified emails, phone numbers, and API-based enrichment workflows.

Decision-first
Built for “alternative” intent, not blog fluff.
Automation-ready
API + workflows, not only manual exports.
Enrichment included
Scrupp positions emails + phones as included.
Quick answer
1-minute read

Choose Evaboot if you mainly want Sales Navigator export + cleaning via a Chrome extension. Choose Scrupp if you need export + enrichment + API automation for teams/agencies.

Best for
Scrupp: scaling, pipelines, API workflows, enrichment.
Evaboot: manual exports from Sales Navigator with cleaned output.

Why teams search “Evaboot alternative”

In most cases, people don’t replace Evaboot because exports stopped working — they replace it because their workflow changed. When the process becomes repeatable (weekly exports, multi-client delivery, CRM sync, enrichment refresh), the decision shifts from “best Chrome exporter” to “best data pipeline.”

Scale

Bulk operations become painful when everything is manual and browser-bound.

Data completeness

Teams want verified emails, and often phone numbers, not just profile rows.

Automation

The moment you need API, webhooks, or CRM sync, “export tool” becomes “infrastructure.”

Scrupp vs Evaboot comparison

Evaboot describes itself as a Sales Navigator scraper focused on exporting clean data and finding emails via its Chrome extension. Scrupp positions itself as a LinkedIn/Sales Navigator/Apollo scraper with verified emails and phone numbers included, plus an API.

Try Scrupp
Category Evaboot Scrupp
Primary focus Sales Navigator export with cleaning + email tools Export + enrichment (email + phone) across SN/LinkedIn/Apollo
How it works Chrome extension adds export button in Sales Navigator Web app + extension presence; positioned for fast export + enrichment
Contact enrichment Email Finder + Email Verifier (credit-based) Verified emails + phone numbers positioned as included
Automation Primarily manual workflow through extension API documentation available for integrations & pipelines

Pricing model signals (credits vs “included data”)

Evaboot publicly documents a credit model for verified email usage (example: “1 lead with verified email = 2 credits”). Evaboot’s Email Verifier FAQ also documents verification credit cost (example: “0.5 credits” per verification). Scrupp’s homepage messaging emphasizes verified emails + phone numbers included for free (positioning-wise).

Item Evaboot (public notes) Scrupp (public notes)
Verified email per lead Documented as credit-based (example: 2 credits per lead with verified email) Homepage states verified emails included for free
Email verification cost Email Verifier FAQ documents “0.5 credits” per verification Positioning emphasizes included verification (no extra tools/credits)
Phone numbers Not emphasized as core in Evaboot’s core positioning Homepage explicitly mentions phone numbers included

Note: Exact plan prices can change; this section reflects publicly stated mechanics and messaging on official pages.

Who wins by workflow

Single list export (manual)
Evaboot is strong: extension-driven, “clean data” focus.
Bulk + enrichment
Scrupp is designed around enriched output (emails + phones).
Automation / integration
Scrupp stands out with public API documentation for pipelines.

Detailed feature matrix

This is a practical matrix for buyers: export capabilities, enrichment, verification, and automation. Use it to match the tool to your exact workflow (solo export vs team pipeline).

Last updated: 2025
Feature / capability Evaboot Scrupp
Sales Navigator export Core positioning: “Sales Navigator scraper” + export via extension Positioned for exporting leads from LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, and Apollo
Export saved searches / lists Chrome extension page mentions exporting searches, lists and saved searches Positioned as exporting targeted leads (platform coverage highlighted)
Data cleaning / clean output Homepage emphasizes “export clean data” Chrome Web Store listing mentions extract + clean + enrich
Email Finder Dedicated Email Finder product page (find verified professional emails) Positioned as “verified emails included”
Email verification (quality checks) Email Verifier page lists SMTP validation, MX checks and more Positioning highlights verified emails; API available for integrations
Phone numbers Not emphasized as a core promise on main positioning pages Homepage explicitly mentions phone numbers included
API access Not a primary positioning pillar; workflow appears extension-first Public API documentation available
Chrome extension Dedicated Chrome extension page; “one click” export messaging Chrome Web Store listing exists; product messaging emphasizes enrichment
Team / agency workflows Can be used by teams, but typical use is export-centric Positioned for scalable extraction and automation with API

What Evaboot does best

  • Sales Navigator export via Chrome extension
  • Cleaned, spreadsheet-friendly output
  • Email Finder + Verifier tooling (credit model)

What Scrupp does best

  • Export from LinkedIn + Sales Navigator + Apollo
  • Verified emails + phone numbers (positioned as included)
  • API-ready automation and enrichment workflows

Best decision rule

If your workflow ends at “download CSV,” Evaboot can be enough. If your workflow starts at “export,” and continues into enrichment, CRM sync, and automation, Scrupp wins.

Data & output depth

A frequent reason teams switch tools is not “export speed,” but output completeness: contacts you can actually reach (verified email) and, for some markets, phone.

Typical output fields (buyer checklist)

Use this as a checklist for what you need in your CSV or CRM payload. Your exact fields can vary by plan and available data.

Field group Evaboot (positioning) Scrupp (positioning)
Identity Lead export from Sales Navigator; cleaned rows Lead export from LinkedIn/SN/Apollo
Company Company info as part of export context Company insights mentioned in extension listing
Email (verified) Email Finder + Verifier products, documented checks (SMTP/MX/etc.) Homepage positioning: verified emails included
Phone numbers Not core in main positioning Homepage positioning: phone numbers included
Data cleaning “Export clean data” is a primary promise Extract + clean + enrich in listing

Email quality notes

Evaboot’s Email Verifier FAQ describes multiple validation checks (SMTP, MX, catch-all, disposable, syntax, etc.). If your priority is deliverability, ensure your tool supports verification—not just guessing patterns.

Practical buyer tip

If you’re sending cold email at scale, prioritize verification + consistent enrichment rules, and keep the export step as a small part of your pipeline.

Automation: why API matters (Scrupp advantage)

The biggest long-term difference between an export tool and an “alternative” is automation. Scrupp provides public API documentation so you can integrate export/enrichment into your stack (CRM, internal tools, workflows).

Open API docs

Example workflows

These are the workflows that typically push teams away from an extension-only approach.

Workflow A: Sales Navigator → Enrichment → CRM
  1. Export targeted leads from Sales Navigator
  2. Enrich contacts (verified email + phone where available)
  3. Push enriched payload into your CRM
  4. Trigger sequences and track outcomes
Workflow B: Weekly refresh for deliverability
  1. Re-verify existing email database
  2. Update risky/invalid entries
  3. Keep bounce rate under control over time
Workflow C: Agency multi-client delivery
  1. Create client-specific prospecting lists
  2. Standardize output columns
  3. Deliver enriched CSVs (or API sync) per client
  4. Repeat weekly without reinventing the process

If you’re choosing for a team

The “best Evaboot alternative” for a team is usually the tool that reduces manual touch points: fewer steps, fewer exports, fewer spreadsheets, more automation.

Decision checklist
  • Do you need API or webhooks?
  • Do you need phones in addition to emails?
  • Do you enrich once or continuously?
  • Is export the goal, or the start of a pipeline?

Who should pick Scrupp instead of Evaboot

If you only need quick Sales Navigator export, Evaboot can be a good fit. If you need complete contact data and automation, Scrupp is the stronger alternative.

Agencies

Multi-client prospecting, standardized deliverables, repeatable enrichment.

Sales teams

Enriched exports you can actually contact: verified email + phone.

RevOps / Growth

Automation, pipelines, CRM sync — less spreadsheet dependency.

Developers

API documentation available to integrate enrichment into your stack.

Evaboot alternative FAQ

Straight answers for the common “which one should I choose?” questions.

Is Scrupp better than Evaboot?
It depends on your workflow. Evaboot is strong for Sales Navigator export + clean output via Chrome extension. Scrupp is a stronger Evaboot alternative when you need verified emails, phone numbers, and API-based automation.
Does Evaboot have email verification?
Yes—Evaboot has a dedicated Email Verifier and publicly describes validation checks (SMTP, MX, catch-all checks and more), with a credit-based pricing mechanic documented in its FAQ.
Does Scrupp have an API?
Yes—Scrupp provides public API documentation so teams can integrate lead export/enrichment into their own workflows and tools.
Which is better for agencies?
Agencies typically benefit more from Scrupp because the workflow is about repeatability: exporting, enriching, delivering data, and integrating into client systems. That’s where API + enrichment positioning is a real advantage.

Ready to switch from Evaboot?

If you want exports plus verified contact data and automation, Scrupp is built for the next stage of your pipeline.

Sources used for this comparison

These are the official pages referenced for documented features and pricing mechanics. (Links open the source pages; keep them on-page for transparency and LLM citation trails.)