Apollo → LinkedIn Enrichment Workflow
Apollo's database has ~40% staleness. This workflow uses live LinkedIn data to refresh Apollo contacts, drop bounce rates below 10%, and surface job changes automatically.
Quick answer
Apollo → LinkedIn Enrichment Workflow
The Apollo → LinkedIn enrichment workflow fixes Apollo's staleness problem. Export your Apollo list as CSV, upload to Scrupp, and Scrupp cross-references each row against live LinkedIn profiles — refreshing job titles, companies, and emails. Rows where the person has changed jobs get flagged; their new company and new email replace the stale Apollo data. Typical result: bounce rate drops from 30-40% to under 10%, and 15-20% of rows get routed to a "moved on" list for re-enrichment in the new company context.
The workflow
Full end-to-end walkthrough
6 steps · est. 1-2 hours for a 5,000-row refresh (mostly waiting for Scrupp to process)
-
1Export the Apollo listApollo
In Apollo, filter to your active segment. Export as CSV. Include LinkedIn URL column (critical for matching).
-
2Upload to Scrupp bulk enrichmentScrupp
In Scrupp, click "Bulk enrichment". Upload the Apollo CSV. Scrupp auto-detects LinkedIn URL and name columns.
-
3Enable live LinkedIn refreshScrupp
Toggle "Refresh against live LinkedIn". Scrupp re-scrapes each LinkedIn profile, pulls current title + company, and flags mismatches with Apollo data.
-
4Re-verify emails via waterfallScrupp
For each row, Scrupp runs the multi-provider email waterfall + SMTP verification. If the person moved jobs, the old email is flagged stale and the new email is generated.
-
5Review and segment the outputGoogle Sheets
Output has a "status" column: unchanged (~60%), updated (~25%, new title/company/email), not found (~15%). Route each segment differently in your CRM.
-
6Push back to HubSpot/SalesforceHubSpot/Salesforce
For "unchanged" rows: just re-sync. For "updated" rows: update existing contact. For "moved on" rows: create a new record at the new company + mark the old record inactive.
Tool stack
What's in the stack
All the tools involved in this workflow.
Source of original contact list. Keep for database breadth.
Live LinkedIn cross-enrichment + email re-verification. Pay-as-you-go.
Intermediate for segmenting the refreshed output.
Destination CRM.
Total cost: $50-100 for a 5,000-row cross-enrichment pass. Re-runs monthly are the best ROI.
FAQ
Common questions
Why is Apollo's data so stale?
Apollo maintains a static database updated on their cycle. LinkedIn is updated in real-time by users. For people-level data (jobs, titles), LinkedIn will always be fresher.
How often should I re-run this refresh?
Monthly is the sweet spot. 15-20% of B2B roles change per year — monthly refreshes catch most of the churn early. Quarterly is minimum.
Does this replace Apollo entirely?
Not for discovery and sequencing — those are Apollo strengths. For data quality, this refresh workflow supplements Apollo with LinkedIn freshness.
What's the bounce rate improvement?
Typical: 30-40% Apollo bounces drop to under 10% after Scrupp cross-enrichment. Some specific segments (old SaaS) see 50%+ → 5% improvement.
Related guides
Keep exploring: Apollo Alternative · Apollo Scraper · Scrupp + Clay + HubSpot workflow · B2B Data Enrichment · Export Apollo to CSV
Run this workflow today
Free Chrome extension · 1 credit/lead scraping + 1 credit/enrichment · No credit card.